Latin America, Caribbean unite to support Ecuador over Assange — RT

Published: 25 August, 2012, 08:47

Permanent council of the Organization of American States in Washington (Reuters / Jason Reed)

Permanent council of the Organization of American States in Washington (Reuters / Jason Reed)

TAGS: MeetingSouth AmericaPoliticsLawUSA,Assange

 

All the members of the Organization of American States, except for the US and Canada, have stated their solidarity and support of Ecuador’s decision to grant asylum to Julian Assange at a meeting of 35-member bloc in Washington.

Senior officials from all states of the Americas adopted a resolution of solidarity with Ecuador. They reaffirmed their “respect of sovereignty” and denounced “the use of forces in solving conflicts.”

All members approved the full text of the document except for Canada and the United States, which refused to express “solidarity” with Quito.

The meeting was called by Ecuador which stated that Britain had threatened to storm its embassy in London to arrest WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who had taken refuge there.

The final version of the resolution, however, did not include reference to the alleged UK threats due to objections from the United States, Canada, Panama, Trinidad and Tobago and others.

Britain, which has observer status at the OAS, insisted it had made no such threats.

“I would like to state unequivocally at the outset that at no time has the British government made any threat against the embassy of Ecuador. Respect for and compliance with international law is at the heart of the foreign policy of the United Kingdom,” Deputy Head of Mission at the British Embassy in Washington Philip Barton said.

During the debate Ecuadoran Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino condemned Britain for what he called an “assault on our sovereignty.”

The United States did not vote against the resolution, but a US State Department representative once again urged the OAS to allow Ecuador, Sweden and the United Kingdom to resolve the matter among themselves.

“It involves matters of criminal justice, European law and the sovereign extradition arrangements between the United Kingdom and Sweden, two nations with very well-respected judicial systems,” said US Department of State representative John D. Feeley.

Following the OAS meeting, Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa expressed his gratitude to the Latin American states that backed Quito in a televised address.

We don’t have anything other than words of gratitude to our brothers of Latin America, to their governments, their people for their overwhelming and decided support for the sovereign position of Ecuador, and the rejection of this explicit threat to enter an embassy and arrest a person granted diplomatic asylum,” he said on Friday.

Earlier, the Ecuadorian president said in an exclusive interview with RT that “Once we granted asylum to Assange, he is under the protection of Ecuador, and we will do everything to make sure this protection is effective.”

Operation Free Assange – Anonymous takes down Interpol website — RT

Published: 27 August, 2012, 01:23
Edited: 29 August, 2012, 13:35

Interpol

Interpol

TAGS: ProtestWikiLeaksAssangeAnonymous

 

Hacktivist group Anonymous claimed they took down the websites of Interpol and a British police unit as part of a campaign demanding freedom for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Several Twitter accounts associated with the loose-knit hacker collective Anonymous announced that the website of International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) had been taken down. The site was unavailable as of 9:18 pm GMT on Sunday, but resumed functioning soon afterward.

The hackers also claimed to have taken down the website of the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), a UK police unit responsible for operations against major criminal organizations.

Assange, the founder and editor of whistleblowing website WikiLeaks, was ordered by Swedish authorities to be extradited from the UK, where he had been under house arrest before taking refuge at London’s Ecuadorian embassy. Two women from Sweden have accused Assange of sex crimes, for which he has not yet been charged.

Assange applied for political asylum in Ecuador over fears that he would be extradited from Sweden to the US, where he would be tried for espionage for his role with WikiLeaks. The Latin American country granted Assange’s request earlier this month.

British authorities have refused to guarantee safe passage out of London for Assange.

UK parents found guilty of honour killing – Europe – Al Jazeera English

UK parents found guilty of honour killingBritish court convicts parents for suffocating daughter they thought was trying to live westernised lifestyle.Last Modified: 04 Aug 2012 07:52inShare1EmailPrintShareFeedbackThe parents of a 17-year-old girl who was killed nine years ago in the UK have been convicted of her murder and jailed for life.Iftikhar Ahmed and his wife Farzana were told on Friday that they were to serve a minimum of 25 years in prison after a jury at Chester Crown Court found them guilty of their daughter Shafileas murder.Shafilea was suffocated with a plastic bag at the family home in Cheshire, northern England on September 11, 2003, because her parents felt that her choice to lead a “Western” life had led to her family being “shamed”.”There is always a trigger. In the case of Shafilea, the abuse she suffered was motivated by her parents desire to control her. To make her to conform to their interpretation of Pakistani culture. They tried to control her, to force her into marriage, and to prevent her from expressing herself,” said Detective Superintendent Geraint Jones, at a news conference after the sentencing.”When this failed, they murdered her. A vile and disgraceful act, against their own daughter, a murder of someone they shouldve been very proud of,” he said.Jones led the inquiry for Cheshire Police from 2003 until 2010.Shafileas parents denied any wrongdoing and in one interview her father Iftikhar was quoted as saying he would never harm his daughter.”Would we kill our own daughter… Never, I couldnt even dream of it,” he said.After Shafileas decomposed remains were discovered in the River Kent in February 2004, however, her parents changed their tone.”The times I did meet them they were polite and very unchallenging I would describe them as. But as the investigation progressed and as the evidence built, particularly once we found Shafileas body, their attitude changed and they became aggressive,” Jones said.”They, in their own minds thought they could use the media to point the finger elsewhere as weve heard in court. But behind it all, we knew, within that house there was torture, there was domestic abuse,” Jones said.During the trial, Aleha, Shafileas sister, testified that her parents repeatedly attacked and abused Shafilea as she grew up. She said that Shafilea had grown increasingly distant from her parents traditional lifestyle.”The word shame has been heard many times during the course of this trial in at least three languages. And the evidence has shown that cultural factors were literally at the heart of the Ahmeds abuse of Shafilea,” said Helen Morris, advocate for the Crown Prosecution Service.”Why did they abuse Shafilea, why did they kill her? Put simply it was because she challenged their regime and refused to conform to their expectations. She wanted to choose how she lived her life and who she married – choices that are fundamental freedoms for any citizen of the United Kingdom,” she said.At the news conference, the police and Crown Prosecution Service said they would review conflicting evidence to see if any further action should be taken.Diana Nammi, a womens rights activist in the UK, told Al Jazeera that there were at least 3,000 reported cases of honour-related violence and killings in the country in 2010.”This is a huge problem. It is not about one family or two families, its about the whole community, its about 3,000 at least … which we believe are just the tip of the iceberg [because] they are the women who had the courage to come forward and seek help,” she said.”There are so many who do not have confidence, they are scared, they are worried about their families and their reputation within the community.”Source: Al Jazeera And Agencies

via UK parents found guilty of honour killing – Europe – Al Jazeera English.

British Police: You did the Islamic morality police proud | Maryam Namazie

 August 2, 2012 at 10:41 pm  Maryam Namazie

Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to join the FEMEN action against Sharia law and Islamism at the Olympics today as I am really sick and travelling tomorrow for a conference in Montreal (which I would most likely have missed since they were arrested).

Reza Moradi was there and filmed their action and the police’s brutal arrest. Interesting how the police were so pre-occupied with covering up their breasts and bodies.

British police: you did your Islamic morality counterparts in Iran, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan proud!

Talk about an upside down world. Regimes that have killed a generation, impose sex apartheid, and still stone people to death in the 21st century are given red carpet treatments by the Olympics Committee and this is what women’s rights campaigners get.

But not to worry, our day will come.

Julian Assange’s right to asylum

  WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is asking Ecuador for asylum, while Sweden seeks to extradite him from England.  Many friends of the Bradley Manning Support Network are asking Ecuador to grant Assange’s request here via RootsAction.

“Assange’s fear of ending up in the clutches of the US is plainly rational… consider the treatment of Bradley Manning

By Glenn Greenwald, UK Guardian (Op-Ed). June 20, 2012

If one asks current or former WikiLeaks associates what their greatest fear is, almost none cites prosecution by their own country. Most trust their own nation’s justice system to recognize that they have committed no crime. The primary fear is being turned over to the US. That is the crucial context for understanding Julian Assange‘s 16-month fight to avoid extradition to Sweden, a fight that led him to seek asylum, Tuesday, in the London Embassy of Ecuador.

The evidence that the US seeks to prosecute and extradite Assange is substantial. There is no question that the Obama justice department has convened an active grand jury to investigate whether WikiLeaks violated the draconian Espionage Act of 1917. Key senators from President Obama’s party, including Senate intelligence committee chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, have publicly called for his prosecution under that statute. A leaked email from the security firm Stratfor – hardly a dispositive source, but still probative – indicated that a sealed indictment has already been obtained against him.Prominent American figures in both parties have demanded Assange’s lifelong imprisonment, called him a terrorist, and even advocated his assassination.

For several reasons, Assange has long feared that the US would be able to coerce Sweden into handing him over far more easily than if he were in Britain. For one, smaller countries such as Sweden are generally more susceptible to American pressure and bullying.

For another, that country has a disturbing history of lawlessly handing over suspects to the US. A 2006 UN ruling found Sweden in violation of the global ban on torture for helping the CIA render two suspected terrorists to Egypt, where they were brutally tortured (both individuals, asylum-seekers in Sweden, were ultimately found to be innocent of any connection to terrorism and received a monetary settlement from the Swedish government).

Perhaps most disturbingly of all, Swedish law permits extreme levels of secrecy in judicial proceedings and oppressive pre-trial conditions, enabling any Swedish-US transactions concerning Assange to be conducted beyond public scrutiny. Ironically, even the US State Department condemned Sweden’s “restrictive conditions for prisoners held in pretrial custody”, including severe restrictions on their communications with the outside world.

Assange’s fear of ending up in the clutches of the US is plainly rational and well-grounded. One need only look at the treatment over the last decade of foreign nationals accused of harming American national security to know that’s true; such individuals are still routinely imprisoned for lengthy periods without any charges or due process. Or consider the treatment of Bradley Manning, accused of leaking to WikiLeaks: a formal UN investigation found that his pre-trial conditions of severe solitary confinement were “cruel, inhuman and degrading”, and he now faces capital charges of aiding al-Qaida. The Obama administration’s unprecedented obsession with persecuting whistleblowers and preventing transparency – whateven generally supportive, liberal magazines call ”Obama’s war on whistleblowers” – makes those concerns all the more valid.

Read more at guardian.co.uk

6 THOUGHTS ON “JULIAN ASSANGE’S RIGHT TO ASYLUM”

LulzSec exposes alleged child porn traders


Apparently operating under the semi-defunct LulzSec banner, infamous hacker Sabu appears to have taken over a website forum alleged to to be trading in child porn.

Over 7000 account log-in details for the site http://www.densetsu.com/ were posted up on pastebin.

The Densetsu site itself now simply contains a list of file folders now marked as “owned by Sabu”.

Sabu’s Twitter feed has be unchracteristically quite of late, possibly because it seems likely he’s been ‘doxed’ as a PR man for Portugal.

A statement on the pastebin post reads: “virtual CP is wrong so we decided to take over the http://www.densetsu.com/ forum”.

hacked!

Densetsu.com and describes its self as “A site dedicated to asian games and entertainment. Anime Densetsu is an interactive site, which allows you to discover people around the world with similar interests.”

We tried one of the log-ins at random and could successfully log in to the site. We left pretty sharpish.

If Sabu has indeed been outed, this may be a PR offensive. After all no-one loves a paedo.



Read more: http://www.itproportal.com/2011/08/30/lulzsec-exposes-alleged-child-porn-traders/#ixzz22R3xtPub